SpongeMan's Sensorimotor Manifesto [hide]
Search [hide]
Last forum posts [hide]
Last wiki comments [hide]
Last visitors [hide]
1)   JessMartone at Sep 03, 2010 [15:33]
2)   wangchao45 at Aug 29, 2010 [01:30]
3)   chris251984 at Aug 28, 2010 [02:31]
4)   dollievaruna at Aug 25, 2010 [03:26]
5)   FrankHill at Aug 22, 2010 [00:17]
6)   judy6kline at Aug 18, 2010 [02:04]
7)   jmjm123 at Aug 17, 2010 [05:56]
8)   allensmith at Aug 16, 2010 [10:51]
9)   resumeplus at Aug 13, 2010 [11:05]
10)   pattypetrillo at Aug 10, 2010 [17:57]
Last changes [hide]

Forum: Discussion on the sensorimotor approach

Forums->Discussion on the sensorimotor approach->Re: Re: Re: Cognitive Access

PaulReeve
Re: Re: Re: Cognitive Access


> I would suggest that cognitive access is such a particular skill that it is worth speaking about it: you can have a machine that has as many sensorimotor skills that you like, if it has no cognitive system to handle them I don't think there is any phenomenality for this machine

Now cognitive access is a skill too? Mamma mia!
 
on: Jun 02, 2006 [12:52] score: 0.00 reads: 722

Posted messages

Top
author message
wedding
wedding
on: Jun 21, 2010 [05:54] score: 0.00
This collection features bold colors and classic styling for the traditional bride with a strong unconventional streak. Colored borders in different styles frame the center panel on each wedding invitation, but each of the borders has its own unmistakable character. Coupled with boldly patterned envelopes, the cheap wedding invitations are both elegant and strikingly unique, a great deal like Vera Wang's bridal dress up games . The two main designs in the Vera Wang Borders collection are the Bar Panel Border and the Hand Tinted Border dress up games . The invitations are coupled with very stylish envelopes with linings inspired by Wang's own fashion dress up games. There are no frilly details, just an elegant, classy and bold style statement.

author message
David_Philipona
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cognitive Access
on: Jun 05, 2006 [15:05] score: 0.00
> > I would suggest that cognitive access is such a particular skill that it is worth speaking about it: you can have a machine that has as many sensorimotor skills that you like, if it has no cognitive system to handle them I don't think there is any phenomenality for this machine
>
> Now cognitive access is a skill too? Mamma mia!

My point precisely was to say that it shouldn't be called a skill (as suggested by the paragraph to which I was answering). I wanted to say that even for those that could argue about cognitive access being after all some kind of skill, it would be such a particular meaning of skill that one should not use the same term. I grant you that it wasn't really clear from my sentence.


Page: 1/1

Show posts:
 
Free Hit Counter
eBay